Sunday, 30 April 2017

Woodward and Bernstein: Journalism, free press more crucial than ever



Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward of Watergate fame argued Saturday night that good journalism is more crucial to a free society than ever in a climate of increasing hostility between the White House and the press.



The speeches from the revered journalists came on the occasion of the first White House correspondents’ dinner since 1981 in which the sitting president did not attend. Ronald Reagan missed the dinner that year while recovering from an assassination attempt, but delivered remarks by phone. Before that, Richard Nixon was the last president to skip the dinner.

Bernstein, a CNN contributor, led the remarks by saying that Nixon targeted the media in an attempt to divert attention from his own misconduct and that of his administration’s officials.

“Richard Nixon tried to make the conduct of the press more the issue in Watergate instead of the conduct of the President and his men,” Bernstein said, speaking to a sold-out crowd in the nation’s capital. “We tried to avoid the noise and let the reporting speak.”

Bernstein also addressed lying and secrecy in the Nixon White House, but stopped short of drawing a direct parallel to President Donald Trump’s administration.


“Almost inevitably, unreasonable government secrecy is the enemy and usually the giveaway about what the real story might be,” Bernstein said to applause. “(W)hen lying is combined with secrecy, there is usually a pretty good road map in front of us.”

He added, “Yes, follow the money but also follow the lies.”

Woodward offered a critical reflection on the state of the mainstream media in 2017, but also emphasized its key role in American democracy.

“Our reporting needs to get both fact and tones right,” he said. “(T)he effort today to get the best obtainable version of the truth is largely made in good faith.”

Speaking to the absent Trump, he said, “Mr. President, the media is not fake news. Let’s take that off the table as we proceed. …

“Whatever the climate, whether the media is revered or reviled, we should and must persist, and I believe we will,” he said. “Any relaxation by the press will be extremely costly to democracy.”



Woodward and Bernstein: Journalism, free press more crucial than ever

Labour will block the sale of weapons to repressive regimes if it wins the election


Labour has signalled it is looking at new measures to ensure British-built weapons and military technology are not bought by repressive regimes around the world.


It comes as the party plans its general election manifesto and following uproar at the Government’s backing for billions of pounds worth of arms sales to Saudi Arabia.


Jeremy Corbyn’s push for a more ethical exports policy comes just days after Sir Michael Fallon, the Defence Secretary, praised a UK firm that sold missiles to Colonel Gaddafi as a “role model” for post-Brexit trade.


Barry Gardiner, the shadow International Trade Secretary, hinted at the new arms measures as he discussed how the party is preparing a broader strategy aimed at exploiting trade opportunities abroad to boost industries at home.


In an exclusive interview with The Independent he said a prime example of the approach would be a push for the abolition of tariffs on environmental technology, like wind turbines and solar panels in future trade deals, to pave the way for thousands of UK jobs.


Mr Gardiner was speaking as Labour prepares its manifesto for the general election.


The Prime Minister has talked a lot about boosting trade after Brexit, but campaigners have raised concerns that her desire to secure any new trade has led to a drop in ethical standards.


The Government has recently approved £3.5bn worth of arms export licenses to Saudi Arabia and a stream of British ministers have visited the kingdom to solicit trade despite its ongoing involvement in a brutal bombing campaign in Yemen.


Asked whether action on arms sales to repressive regimes would be tackled in Labour’s manifesto, Mr Gardiner said he could not discuss details ahead of its official publication, but went on: “Our party has always pledged to embed human rights and social justice into our trade policy.


“Every Labour government would wish to uphold the strongest licensing criteria to ensure that any UK exports could not be used for repression or human rights abuse.”


Britain is the second biggest arms exporter in the world according to government figures. The Independent revealed last year that the UK has sold weapons to 22 of the 30 countries on its own human rights watch list since 2010.


Sir Michael compounded fears over future trade when he visited and promoted firm MBDA last week, which signed a contract to provide £200m worth of missiles and military communications equipment to Colonel Gaddafi’s Libyan regime in 2007. It also sells missiles to the Saudi air force.


Mr Corbyn has already called for an end to arms exports to Saudi Arabia, making a manifesto pledge connected to the trade all the more likely.


More broadly, Mr Gardiner believes he has identified a key weakness in the approach to post-Brexit trade taken by Ms May, he says the Tories have failed to tie their approach to exports to an industrial strategy that grows industries and jobs in the UK.


He said: “We are absolutely clear that our trade policy must be completely integrated with our industrial strategy, and that’s what I’ve tried to do.


“In particular, our industrial strategy is predicated on the Paris [climate change] agreement and the fact that in the second half of this century we are going to be living in a zero-carbon economy.”


He explained that the environmental goods and services sector is rapidly expanding in the UK and boasts a highly skilled workforce with huge experience.


The Labour frontbencher said: “We’ve led the world with the 2008 Climate Change Act, and that’s enabled us to have now what is the most advanced offshore wind anywhere in the world.


“It’s enabled us to develop these technologies, and the service sector that backs them up is also at a very high level.”



He pointed to the World Trade Organisation where a group of nations are pushing for an “environmental goods agreement” to ensure tariffs on them are reduced to as close to zero as possible, adding that Labour is a “very strong advocate” of the move.


He then hinted that driving down the tariffs could form a part of any future UK trade deal under a Labour government, adding: “You could do a multilateral agreement, and certainly you could have bilateral agreements which did that.


“I think it’s fair to say Labour is very keen to ensure that the free flow of environmental goods promoting a low carbon future and benefitting the environment should not have additional trade barriers put in their way.”


Turning his fire on the Tories, he pointed to claims in Europe that the British Government argued against measures to protect EU industries against Chinese steel dumping.


The downwards spiral of the price of steel threatened to kill off thousands of jobs in the UK, with the industry still under intense pressure.


Mr Gardiner said: “The Tories have a record of arguing that it doesn’t matter if somebody is dumping stuff on your market at below production cost, by saying our consumers benefit from that. The problem is our producers then go out of business.


“There is no point in telling people you can buy foreign products that are cheaper now, because you are saying it to people who are replying, ‘yes, but I don’t have a job’.”


Mr Gardiner said Labour could be trusted to act within international rules to protect UK industries and jobs, but pointed to Tory Brexiteers who are signalling liberalising instincts.


He added: “The trouble with this Government is that what they have consistently said is, ‘it doesn’t matter’.


“It does, because people are losing their jobs in this country as a result of their failure to take the remedies that are offered under the world trading system.”



Labour will block the sale of weapons to repressive regimes if it wins the election

10 memorable lines from comedian Hasan Minhaj at the WHCA dinner



President Donald Trump was a no-show at the first White House Correspondents’ Association dinner of his presidency. But that didn’t keep “Daily Show” comedian Hasan Minhaj from addressing “the elephant not in the room.”



Trump was a target for Minhaj when he performed at the Radio and Television Correspondents’ Association dinner last year, and Saturday night’s routine wasn’t much different.

Jeff Mason, president of the White House correspondents group, said Minhaj wasn’t chosen to “roast the President in absentia,” but that’s exactly what the 31-year-old comedian did.

“I was looking for somebody who is funny and who is entertaining — because I want the dinner to be entertaining — but who can also speak to the message that the whole dinner is going to speak to … the importance of a free press,” Mason said earlier this month on MSNBC.

Here are 10 of Minhaj’s most memorable lines from the dinner:




On being a minority in America:



“That’s why you gotta be on your ‘A’ game,” Minhaj told the press. “You gotta be twice as good. You can’t make any mistakes, because when one of you messes up he blames your entire group. … And now you know what it feels like to be a minority.”


On the First Amendment:



“This event is about celebrating the First Amendment and free speech. Free speech is the foundation of an open and liberal democracy from college campuses to the White House. Only in America can a first generation Indian American Muslim kid get on this stage and make fun of the President.”


On CNN:



“Don, every time I watch your show, I feel like I’m watching a reality TV show. ‘CNN Tonight’ should just be called ‘Wait a second! Now hold on! Stop yelling at each!’ with Don Lemon.”


On Vladimir Putin:



“We have to address the elephant not in the room. The leader of our country is not here. But that’s because he’s in Moscow.”


On Trump’s frequent golfing outings:



“Every time Trump goes golfing, the headline should read, ‘Trump golfing. Apocalypse delayed. Take the W.’ “


On Kellyanne Conway and ‘alternative facts’:



“Even if you guys groan, I’ve already hired Kellyanne Conway. She’s gonna go on TV Monday and tell everyone I ‘killed.’ It really doesn’t matter.”


On the Trump administration:



“The news coming out of the White House is so stressful, I’ve been watching ‘House of Cards’ just to relax.”


On Frederick Douglass:



“Frederick Douglass isn’t here, and that’s because. He’s dead. Someone please tell the President!”


On Afghanistan:



“Historically, the president usually performs at the correspondents’ dinner, but I think I speak for all of us when I say he’s done far too much bombing this month.”


On headlining the WHCA dinner:



“I would say it is an honor to do this, but that would be an alternative fact. It is not. No one one wanted to do this so of course it falls in the hands of an immigrant. That’s how it always goes down.”



10 memorable lines from comedian Hasan Minhaj at the WHCA dinner

Demi Moore Knee Liposuction Before After

Are you searching Demi Moore Knee Liposuction Before After, here is a web site Plastic Surgery Celebrities may be printed a fresh matter, make sure you read the idea right here http://iconplasticsurgery.com/demi-moore-knee-liposuction-before-after/

Find the Demi Moore Knee Liposuction Before After

Demi Moore Knee Liposuction Before After
Read more go here Demi Moore Knee Liposuction Before After

Saturday, 29 April 2017

Why is Donald Trump not attending the White House correspondents' dinner?


Unless he has a last-minute change of heart, today, President Donald Trump is set to become the first sitting president to skip the annual White House Correspondents Association dinner in 36 years, according to NPR.


Seven days ago, the president reaffirmed his Feb. 25 tweet announcing he would not attend tonight’s customary gala with his colleagues in the media. Instead, Trump tweeted on April 22 that he’s hosting a “BIG rally in Pennsylvania.”



But why?


The president certainly had no problem attending correspondents’ dinners back when he was just a celebrity. The former reality TV star has never been one to shy away from the spotlight, so why would Trump ditch tonight’s dinner?


The likeliest answer is a sadly simple one.



Trump just can’t take a joke!


You’d think he’d be used to it by now, but nah.


The billionaire’s decade-long back-and-forth feud with comedian Rosie O’Donnell, for example, is the stuff of pop culture legend. O’Donnell was co-host of The View back in 2006 when she criticized Trump’s decision not to fire Miss USA beauty queen Tara Conner after details of Conner’s alleged drug use and underage drinking were revealed, according to CNN. (Trump used to own the Miss USA, Miss Teen USA and Miss Universe pageants; he sold them to the WME/IMG talent agency in 2015.)


After O’Donnell made subsequent jokes about Trump and his multiple bankruptcies on The View, Trump responded in an Entertainment Tonight interview, calling her “fat ass,” “unattractive,” “disgusting,” a “slob” and a “loser,” while threatening to sue her.


In 2013, the real estate mogul actually sued comedian Bill Maher for $5 million after Maher joked that one of Trump’s parents was an orangutan.


Maher was in disbelief.



“Really? We’re going to court about this?” the comedian said during a 2013 episode of his HBO show, Real Time with Bill Maher. “His lawyer sent me a letter. I shit you not. This is real,” Maher continued before quoting from the court document, which cited Trump’s birth certificate as proof his dad wasn’t an ape. “Do these morons even know it’s impossible for people and apes to produce offspring?!” he added.



Since taking office earlier this year, Trump has taken the cast of Saturday Night Live to task for repeatedly poking fun at his expense, with actor Alec Baldwin starring as impersonator in chief. SNL has been poking fun at politicians on both sides of the aisle for decades, but it looks like Trump isn’t laughing.



It’s no wonder then that the president wouldn’t want to attend the White House correspondents’ dinner, where he’ll be surrounded by journalists, and at least one comedian, who have repeatedly criticized him.



Hasan Minhaj, a Muslim American funny man who has joked about Trump’s tweets and his proposed Muslim travel ban in the past, was chosen to host this year’s correspondents’ dinner. Minhaj did more than tell jokes when he hosted the Radio Television Correspondents Association dinner in June; he also lectured the room about Congress’ failure to pass gun control measures following the Orlando nightclub shooting.


Minhaj expressed disappointment that Trump probably won’t be there tonight.


“It is a tremendous honor to be a part of such a historic event even though the president has chosen not to attend this year. SAD!” he said in a Trump-mocking statement after his hosting gig was announced.


Perhaps the president should take advice from his old nemesis, Bill Maher.


“Public figures, of course, don’t always like everything that’s said about them, but that’s how we roll here in America,” Maher said during the same 2013 episode of his show. “We love our free speech and we love celebrities getting taken down a peg. So Don, just suck it up a bit and take it like everybody else.”



Why is Donald Trump not attending the White House correspondents' dinner?

Trump to appoint anti-abortion activist Charmaine Yoest to HHS post


President Donald Trump announced on Friday he will select Charmaine Yoest, a fellow at social conservative group American Values and former leader of anti-abortion organization Americans United For Life, as the deputy secretary for public affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services.


AUL is one of the most prominent anti-abortion groups in the country; the New York Times wrote in 2011, when Republicans made significant gains in state legislatures across the U.S., the group wrote a third of the 92 laws restricting access to abortion passed in 24 states.


Yoest’s hallmark as leader of the organization, the Times wrote, was being “especially good at sounding reasonable rather than extreme.” In an interview with the paper, the Times wrote she repeatedly dismissed scientific data showing increased access to birth control lowers abortion rates and disproving a link between breast cancer and abortion by saying scientists are under the control of the “abortion lobby.”


In 2016, Yoest co-wrote an article for Time with Tennessee Rep. Diane Black calling abortion the “true war on women” and saying Planned Parenthood‘s opposition to “informed consent” laws — which require doctors to show women information designed to prevent them from ending their pregnancies — was a “callous betrayal of women.”


Yoest is also personally opposed to other forms of contraception like intrauterine devices.



The HHS position does not require Senate confirmation, and according to Talking Points Memo, will primarily involve communicating HHS Secretary Tom Price’s agenda to the public. Price is anti-choice, believes employers should be allowed to fire employees for using birth control and backs defunding family-planning group Planned Parenthood, which provides reproductive health services to millions of people across the country.


“It is unacceptable that someone with a history of promoting myths and false information about women’s health is appointed to a government position whose main responsibility is to provide the public with accurate and factual information,” Planned Parenthood executive vice president Dawn Laguens told Politico.



Trump to appoint anti-abortion activist Charmaine Yoest to HHS post

Lucian Wintrich, Chadwick Moore mock transgender women at gay Republican event


While speaking at a forum at the Metropolitan Republican Club in New York City on Thursday, two of the most notorious right-wing gay men made comments that mocked transgender women, while one of them ranted against the Islamic religion, BuzzFeed reports.


The forum, billed as an “all-star” panel representing the “new gay movement in the Republican party,” apparently spent more time mocking the left than discussing policy. Two of the five all-white panelists were Lucian Wintrich, the White House press correspondent for alt-right clickbait blog Gateway Pundit, and Chadwick Moore, who gained notoriety after his profile of alt-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos in Out was widely panned.


Lucian Wintrich mocked White House LGBT liaison Raffi Freedman-Gurspan as an “unattractive tranny” while speaking and relayed — falsely — that the office had only been around for a few months.


“Begrudgingly, I’ll say ‘she,'” Wintrich said when speaking of Freedman-Gurspan. Though Wintrich claimed the office had only been around for a few months, the office has been around since former President Bill Clinton appointed someone to it in 1995, according to BuzzFeed.


Moore joined in to talk about trans issues, applauding Trump for lifting Obama’s interpretation of Title IX, which allowed transgender students to use the public facilities that match their gender identity.


Moore called the original guidance “horrifying,” claiming it “turned every bathroom and every locker room in the country gender-neutral.”


He added, “It shouldn’t be there. We’re going have trans kids taking dumps in the streets? What were they doing before Obama did this?”


These two are not the only gay Republicans who have a controversial viewpoint on trans issues. Earlier this week, conservative gay Republican and president of Gays for Trump Peter Boykin tweeted that gays must not allow trans people to usurp the gay agenda, even though transgender people were on the front lines of the fight for LGBTQ equality.



Before the night was through, Wintrich also hurled grenades at the Islamic faith.



He said, “Islam inherently hates gay people. They hate Christians. They hate Western culture. They don’t understand why every woman in here isn’t wearing a polyester blanket.”


Wintrich is no stranger to controversy. A planned visit to NYU in February had to be postponed. While Wintrich blamed NYU’s anti-fascist groups, NYU stated they didn’t have enough security for the event, which was sponsored by NYU’s College Republicans. Later in February, Mic reported that a new writer on Gateway Pundit had only written articles praising Wintrich, who is also a Pundit employee.



Lucian Wintrich, Chadwick Moore mock transgender women at gay Republican event

Turkey blocks Wikipedia for 'not removing content'


Wikipedia rejected removing content describing Turkey’s cooperation with ‘terror groups’, officials say.


Turkey has blocked Wikipedia – the online encyclopedia – for articles and comments that suggested the country was in cooperation with “terror groups”.


Turkish officials had been in contact with the website various times and requested the content in question be removed, state-run Anadolu Agency quoted the ministry of transport, maritime and communications as saying.


The report said the site refused to remove the content in question, however.


Wikipedia “has started acting as part of the circles who carry out a smear campaign against Turkey in the international arena, rather than being cooperative in fight against terror”, ministry officials were quoted as saying.


The website tried to show Turkey “at the same level and in cooperation with terror groups”, the report said.


A block affecting all language editions of Wikipedia in Turkey was detected at about 05:00GMT after an administrative order by Turkish authorities, the Turkey Blocks monitoring group, which watches internet restrictions in the country, said in a statement.


Wikipedia’s founder vowed on Saturday to stand with Turks after the encyclopedia ban.


“Access to information is a fundamental human right,” Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales said on his Twitter feed. “Turkish people I will always stand with you to fight for this right.”


Other websites, including leading social media, appeared to be working normally.


Turkey has over the last few years temporarily blocked access to popular sites – including Facebook, YouTube and Twitter – in the wake of major events such as mass protests or bomb attacks.


In March 2014, YouTube was banned for several months in Turkey after the site was used to broadcast purported footage of a security meeting on Syria.


In the summer of 2013, severe restrictions were imposed on social media during mass anti-government protests.


Reports of block on VPNs


Savvy internet users frequently resort to the use of VPNs to get around these bans, although there have been complaints that these too have also started to be blocked.


The government says such measures are always temporary and are needed for national security reasons, but critics see the blocks as further restrictions on civil liberties under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan‘s rule.


In November 2016, Turkey imposed temporary restrictions lasting several hours on the messaging service WhatsApp as well as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other sites following the controversial arrests of pro-Kurdish MPs.


Prime Minister Binali Yildirim then acknowledged that “from time to time for security reasons we can use such measures… These are temporary measures. Once the danger is passed, everything returns to normal.”


The move to block Wikipedia caused an uproar on social media in Turkey with users angrily denouncing the decision to restrict access to one of the world’s most popular websites.



Turkey blocks Wikipedia for 'not removing content'

Philippine leader says N Korea 'wants to end world'

Rodrigo Duterte says North Korean leader Kim wants to ‘finish everything’ and ‘drag us all down’ in a nuclear war.



Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte on Saturday urged the United States to show restraint after North Korea’s latest missile test and to avoid playing into the hands of leader Kim Jong-un, who “wants to end the world”.


Tensions between the US and the North have risen sharply in recent weeks as a series of North Korean missile tests have prompted dire warnings from President  Donald Trump‘s administration about curtailing its nuclear weapons programme.


US officials have repeatedly warned “all options are on the table” – including military strikes – to curb the North’s nuclear ambitions.


The US has deployed an American naval strike group – the USS Carl Vinson – off the Korean peninsula. North Korea has responded by threatening to sink the aircraft carrier and launch nuclear attacks on the US’ regional allies South Korea and Japan.


The notoriously blunt Duterte said the Southeast Asia region was extremely worried about tensions between the United States and North Korea, and said one misstep would be a “catastrophe” and Asia would be the first victim of a nuclear war.


The United States, Japan, South Korea and China, he said, were sparring with a man who was excited about the prospect of firing missiles.


Duterte is current chairman of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) and was to speak by telephone to US President Donald Trump later on Saturday. He said he would urge Trump not to get into a confrontation with Kim.


“There seems to be two countries playing with their toys and those toys are not really to entertain,” he told a news conference after the ASEAN summit in Manila, referring to Washington and Pyongyang.


“You know that they are playing with somebody who relishes letting go of missiles and everything. I would not want to go into his [Kim’s] mind because I really do not know what’s inside but he’s putting Mother Earth, the planet to an edge.”


North Korea test-fired a ballistic missile on Saturday shortly after US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson warned that failure to curb Pyongyang’s nuclear and ballistic missile programmes could lead to “catastrophic consequences”.


US and South Korean officials said the test appeared to have failed, in what would be the North’s fourth straight unsuccessful missile test since March.


The USS Carl Vinson, meanwhile, kicked off a joint military drill with the South Korean navy on Saturday.


“Immediately after the aircraft carrier arrived in the Sea of Japan, South Korea and the US strike forces launched a drill from 6:00pm [09:00GMT],” a defence ministry spokesman told AFP news agency.


The drill aimed to verify the allies’ capability to track and intercept enemy ballistic missiles, he said. He declined to clarify how long the drill would last, but Yonhap news agency said it was expected to continue until sometime next week.


The manoeuvres will also include a live-fire exercise and anti-submarine exercises, the spokesman added.


Duterte said it was incumbent upon the United States as the responsible country to not rise to Kim’s provocations. He said he was sure Trump had cautioned his military not to allow the situation to spiral out of control.


“Who am I to say that you should stop? But I would say ‘Mr President, please see to it that there is no war because my region will suffer immensely,'” Duterte said.


“I will just communicate to [Trump], ‘just let him play … do not play into his hands’.”


He added: “The guy [Kim] simply wants to end the world, that is why he is very happy. He is always smiling. But he really wants to finish everything and he wants to drag us all down.”



Philippine leader says N Korea 'wants to end world'

Jake Butt to collect on loss-of-value policy following torn ACL

 


ANN ARBOR, MI – NOVEMBER 19: Michigan Wolverines tight end Jake Butt (88) takes in the action and gets teary eyed following the 20-10 victory in the NCAA football game between the Indiana Hoosiers and Michigan Wolverines on November 19, 2016, at Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Butt, who tore his ACL in the Orange Bowl against Florida State, has a $2 million loss-of-value policy that he started collecting insurance on when he wasn’t picked in the top half of the third round Friday night.


He first started collecting, at $10,000 a pick tax-free, in the middle of the third round, a source with knowledge of the policy with ISI told ESPN. Through the 141st overall pick near the end of Round 4 on Saturday, Butt was set to receive $500,000 on the policy.


The 2016 Mackey Award winner for the best tight end in the nation, Butt suffered a second torn ACL in the Orange Bowl. The subsequent surgery prohibited him from showing teams what he could do.


Butt took out a $2 million total disability policy with a $2 million loss-of-value policy attached before the start of the season. The loss-of-value rider cost roughly $25,000, a source said.


Through the first three rounds, six tight ends have been drafted: Alabama‘s O.J. Howard (No. 19), Ole MissEvan Engram (23), Miami‘s David Njoku (29), South Alabama‘s Gerald Everett (44), Ashland‘s Adam Shaheen (45) and Florida International‘s Jonnu Smith (100).



Loss-of-value policies have gained popularity over the past five years. The players who have most famously collected from their draft stock falling have been Oregon‘s Ifo Ekpre-Olomu, who made $3 million in insurance after tearing his ACL and dropping to the seventh round in 2015, and Notre Dame‘s Jaylon Smith, who collected $850,000 from his fall to the second round after teams passed on him following ACL and MCL tears. Both policies were also with ISI.



Jake Butt to collect on loss-of-value policy following torn ACL

The kids suing Donald Trump are marching to the White House





“The state of the planet is unraveling all around us because of our addiction to fossil fuels,” Xiuhtezcatl Martinez said at the steps of the US Supreme Court this week. “For the last several decades, we have been neglecting the fact that this is the only planet that we have and that the main stakeholders in this issue (of climate change) are the younger generation. Not only are the youth going to be inheriting every problem that we see in the world today — after our politicians have been long gone — but our voices have been neglected from the conversation.

“Our politicians are no longer representing our voices.”

So, what’s a voiceless kid to do?



How about sue President Donald Trump and his administration — and then march to the White House?


Martinez is one of 21 young people taking Trump and members of his administration to federal court over inaction on global warming. On Saturday, several of these “climate kid’ plaintiffs — the youngest is 9 — will walk alongside the chanting and sign-pumping adults at the March for Climate, Jobs and Justice in Washington. That demonstration is a call for a clean energy revolution, and it’s expected to draw thousands. Perhaps fittingly, local forecasts call for potentially record-setting temperatures above 90 degrees Fahrenheit. Demonstrators plan to converge on the White House.

Yes, it’s easy to tire of protests in the Trump era, with this rally coming right on the heels of last week’s March for Science and not so long after the Women’s March. Talk is cheap. But these climate kids deserve your attention.



Instead of bemoaning the Orwellian satire that has become the American news cycle, these kids are doing something. They’re suing on behalf of the future.

Their lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Oregon, initially targeted then-President Barack Obama and his administration. Last year, it survived motions by industry and government to dismiss the case. It has taken on new significance in the first 100 days of Trump’s tenure. The President has famously called climate change a hoax, and members of his Cabinet have equivocated on the science, injecting doubt into a long-held scientific consensus that humans are causing the planet to warm by burning fossil fuels and pumping heat-trapping pollution into the atmosphere.




The administration’s efforts go well beyond rhetoric. Trump ordered a review of the Clean Power Plan, Obama’s signature climate legislation. He aims to open federal lands and ocean for fossil fuel extraction. Coal jobs are coming back, he crows. Nevermind that millions of people around the world die each year from diseases linked to air pollution — much of which comes from coal.



Since they’re young, they will live longer into the climate-changed future.

They’re people like Levi Draheim, who at 9 years old is the youngest child plaintiff. He’s a bubbly kid with wild curly hair who lives on the coast of Florida, a place threatened by rising seas. As the Earth warms, the oceans expand and ice melts. Draheim told me he dreams frequently that his home is underwater. Those dreams have only become more frequent since Trump’s election, he said.





“It was really highly disturbing to me that (adults) would choose somebody who doesn’t believe in climate change — and is not going to,” he said. “It’s scary having someone who doesn’t believe in climate change being our president and shutting down the (Environmental Protection Agency), or trying to. It is so anti-preventing climate change.”

Draheim isn’t old enough to vote, of course. But Saturday’s march — and the court case — give him and other kids a voice. Julia Olson, an attorney and founder of Our Children’s Trust, the nonprofit helping to bring the lawsuit, told me she expects the case to go to trial later this year. In court, she told a Washington crowd, “alternative facts are perjury.”

Experts in climate law say the suit may be a long shot but remains significant.

“The case is important, in my mind, from a symbolic and ethics perspective,” said Deborah Sivas, director of the Environmental Law Clinic at Stanford Law School. “It often takes the law a long time to catch up to changing moral sensibilities. It only does so when people are willing to press innovative, outside-the-box arguments. My hope is that we will be able to look back on this case as an early, first mover of a changing jurisprudence.”



“After several years with little success, environmental plaintiffs have now won climate change cases in several countries ​based on constitutional, human rights and international law grounds, as opposed to the more traditional statutory grounds — the Netherlands, Pakistan, Austria and South Africa,” Michael Gerrard, director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School, said in an email. “The Oregon case now joins that list, and its symbolic importance has added weight now that Washington is run by climate deniers.”

Olson, the attorney for the kids, said the case is not symbolic and can win. Those who say otherwise “are denying the capacity of humans to take care of democracy and take care of the planet,” she said.

I spent a couple days this week with the climate kids. I heard about their visits to Washington museums and to see the Constitution. I watched as they sang and danced at DC Metro stops, playing Kendrick Lamar simultaneously on two phones to get twice the experience. I talked to them about their hopes and fears about this case, about why so many American adults — 47% according to a Yale survey — don’t understand humans are causing global warming. They explained why they’re marching and speaking here even at a moment when they worry adults might not listen.




“Most people know climate change is happening, but they push it aside so they can continue living their lives,” said Isaac Vergun, 15.

“It’s not their fault,” chimed in Zealand Bell, 13. “They don’t know better.”

Their hope and generosity are infectious. Their parents and attorneys didn’t put them up to this. (I’ve talked with kids who had to convince their parents to let them do this.) The kids are genuinely concerned their generation will inherit an irreparably messed-up world.

The truth is that we adults need these climate kids.

We need them more than thousands of adults marching on Saturday.

We need them as a moral compass.

And we need them to remind us that our actions will echo for generations to come.

“They’ll be adults by the time they get to court,” Cherri Foytlin, one of their parents, joked as we watched several of the kids speak alongside US senators Thursday at the Supreme Court.

I hope not. But if so, they’ll be better adults than most.









The kids suing Donald Trump are marching to the White House

Donald Trump's 100 days have already reshaped America


Donald J. Trump has launched his presidency with a 100-day stretch of accomplishments and progress that has had a positive impact on millions of Americans.



 



President Trump has enacted more legislation and signed more executive orders in his first 100 days than any president in a half century, despite historic Democratic obstruction. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch sits on the Supreme Court. Illegal border crossings are at a 17-year low. U.S. exports have spiked to a two-year high. As the economy has created hundreds of thousands of jobs, the number of people collecting unemployment has hit a 17-year low.  Mr. Trump has started to chip away at a burdensome regulatory framework that punishes job creators, prohibits innovation, and prevents aspiring entrepreneurs from entering the marketplace, saving companies and workers and estimated $18 billion annually.


Commander-in-Chief Trump has shown strength and started to restore America’s standing in the world. Investments in the military, swift action in Syria, Afghanistan, and 16 bi-lateral meetings with world leaders enhance the safety and security of America, her allies, and her citizens.


These facts fly in the face of a presumptively negative portrayal by many in the media.























A recent study found that 89 percent of the broadcast media’s coverage of President Trump has been negative, even as objective measures indicate that Americans are feeling extraordinarily optimistic with President Trump at the helm.


Yet most Americans discern the difference between news and noise, and they want their country – and their President – to succeed.


According to a Pew Research Center survey, Americans hold the most positive assessment of the economy in 10 years. Consumer confidence has soared to its highest level in more than 16 years. Manufacturers’ optimism is up 35 points from just a year ago, clocking in at 93%.  Homebuilders’ confidence has reached a twelve-year high.







In three short months, President Trump has delivered on his vow to the forgotten men and women of America to upend a swamp-like system that favors special interests and the powerful. Rather than be ignored, the middle class inspire greater accountability and oversight measures in government, a bold tax reform and relief plan, and increased opportunities in vocational and technical education and related employment.


It took President Obama more than a year to pass Obamacare. It has taken President Trump a matter of weeks to fashion a replacement for Obamacare that lowers costs, increases access and improves quality in health care.


President Trump’s first 100 days – like his election – is historic in many ways. So, too, is the vocal and visceral obstruction of Democratic elected officials. They have made plain their wholesale resistance, despite the desire among many of their constituents to support major pieces of the Trump agenda. If Democrats join this President in putting America first and unite for the good of the American people, the President’s successful first 100 days will be a prelude to an extraordinary American renaissance that will span generations.



Donald Trump's 100 days have already reshaped America

'Mr Gorilla' raises £26,000 by crawling London Marathon


A man who crawled the London Marathon dressed as a gorilla has completed the course and raised £26,000 for charity.


Tom Harrison – who calls himself Mr Gorilla – took six-and-a-half days to do the 26.2 mile route on his hands and knees, “gorilla-style”, in aid of The Gorilla Organization.


Mr Harrison crossed the finish line on The Mall with his sons and had a medal presented by conservationist Bill Oddie.


He said he felt “tired but happy”.


“Prior to this, the most I had crawled in one go was a mile, so I found the first day of the marathon really exhausting,” he said.



“Each day became its own little marathon.


“I’ll be glad to get the costume washed as it’s getting a little bit fruity.


“I think I’ve started to smell a bit like a gorilla.”


The father-of-two, a Met Police officer who lives in Amersham, Buckinghamshire, started his attempt on 22 April, crawling the streets of the capital for between 10 and 12 hours a day.


He originally aimed to raise £1,500 but said the reaction to his challenge had been “incredible”.


“The fact it went global has been completely unexpected, but brilliant,” he said.


Mr Harrison was joined outside Buckingham Palace by his two sons, Nicholas, six, and Alex, four – also dressed as gorillas.



They were watched by a crowd of around 100 people.


Mr Harrison, 41, originally from Worcester, was inspired to take on the challenge by his passion for the work of the charity, which runs conservation projects in several African countries.



The charity’s executive director Jillian Miller, described his efforts as “incredible”.


“He’s now officially our highest fundraiser ever,” she said.


“He feels very strongly, as the father of two little boys, that he wants to help preserve biodiversity for future generations.”



'Mr Gorilla' raises £26,000 by crawling London Marathon

In today's news climate, this satirical anti-abortion headline seems real — but it's not


When Serena Williams (accidentally) announced she was expecting, it didn’t take long for people to put together that the world champion tennis star had won the Australian Open while pregnant.


While Williams insisted it was mostly NBD, for us mere mortals it was proof of the athlete’s godlike tennis skills — which is why many Twitter users were baffled when @PollyRosey tweeted out a headline reading, “Anti-abortion advocate calls for Serena Williams to be stripped of grand slam title, claiming ‘fetal personhood’ means she was unfairly advantaged.”


The deck on the article added, “The legislator claims the fetus technically should have counted as a doubles partner.”


A quick scan of the article, published on Australian student newspaper Honi Soit‘s site, would reveal that it was filed to the “comedy” section. But considering the rigorous — and often straight-up absurd — anti-abortion waters we’re swimming in, some 90,000 Twitter users (as of this writing) accepted the headline as fact.



Sure — it’s possible that a good portion of those 90,000 users who favorited and retweeted @PollyRosey’s tweet could’ve done so realizing it was a joke.


That sure as hell wasn’t the case in the user’s mention, though.


“What are they going to do next — make pregnant women pay for two bus fares?” Twitter user @_Isabellaannie wrote. “I can hardly see how it’s an advantage your body would be going through so much already,” @PollyRosey replied, apparently in earnest.


“If anything it’s a disadvantage as she’s carrying extra weight and has to be more careful, how ridiculous,” she added in a follow-up tweet, which earned 291 favorites.


Under normal circumstances, we might think it ridiculous that tens of thousands of people would believe that a legislator in the United States government would suggest Williams’ fetus counts as her tennis partner. But in a world where a Missouri state senator joked that women should get abortions at the zoo, it could easily be mistaken for just another day in President Donald Trump’s America.



In today's news climate, this satirical anti-abortion headline seems real — but it's not

Trump’s Chief Opponent

Chuck Schumer Sees Himself As Trump’s Chief Opponent — But Hey, At Least They’re Talking Again


The top Democrat in Congress says he’s “fueled” by fighting Trump and offered a new idea for opposing the president in his hometown.





Bill Clark / CQ-Roll Call,Inc.




The mayor of New York should refuse to pay for Donald Trump’s security, the top Democrat in Washington suggested in an interview on Friday.


“[Mayor Bill de Blasio] ought to tell the Congress if we don’t pay for it, New York City cops aren’t guarding it, and let the Feds put more people in,” Senator Chuck Schumer said in an interview with BuzzFeed News. “That’s what I think he should do.”


It was a typically confrontational suggestion from the New York senator and Senate minority leader, who is ex officio the leader of the official resistance to Donald Trump.


Speaking in his ornate office in the Capitol building Friday as Washington assesses Trump’s first 100 days, Schumer had nothing good to say about his former donor and constituent. The Trump Administration has been “a huge disappointment to most Americans” and demonstrated “sheer incompetence,” he said.


To Trump’s remark that he thought the presidency “would be easier” than his previous career, Schumer said: “Good morning! Mr. President, you’re in the big leagues now. Of course it’s going to take a lot of work, it’s probably the hardest job in the world.”


Despite the back-and-forth barbs — Trump was, for a time, referring to him as “fake tears Chuck Schumer” — the Democratic leader and the president are talking again. Still, it is not, Schumer said, a close relationship, nor are they speaking frequently. Trump does not call Schumer on his cellphone or even his office directly, but instead White House aides connect them by calling the Capitol switchboard.




“When I talk to him, I try to talk to him about serious issues and he just changes the subject.”



“When I talk to him, I try to talk to him about serious issues and he just changes the subject,” Schumer said. “I told him we want to work with him where we can work with him, we want to work with him on a big infrastructure bill — America needs to rebuild its infrastructure, haven’t gotten anywhere with him. I told him on North Korea, the way to deal with North Korea is to get China to be much tougher and to get China to be tougher is for us to be tougher with China on trade. Nothing. He listens to what I have to say on the important subject of the day and then he talks about what he wants to talk about.”


Schumer won’t say what Trump wants to talk about — only that it’s typically “small things.” But the lines of communication are at least open for now.


The senator also seems fairly relaxed for a man recovering from a shocking election loss and who is overseeing a party in a purgatory of soul-searching and wound-licking.


Part of that can be attributed to Trump himself. The president has scored no real legislative victories in his first 100 days and remains historically unpopular. Republicans are struggling to muster support for their bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, and Trump dropped a demand that funding to build a border wall be included in a must-pass spending measure.


“I think we’ve been strong, we’ve been united,” Schumer said, leaning back in a chair with his shoeless feet on a coffee table. “Who would have thought after the first hundred days Republicans would have been divided, angry, and on defense? And Democrats would be united, strong, and offense.”





Alex Wong / Getty Images




Democrats have, in fact, struggled with internal division lately, with bitter disputes over whether the party could support a candidate for Omaha mayor who had at one point voted against abortion rights.


“Democrats are a pro-choice party. I’m proudly pro-choice, but we don’t have a checklist,” Schumer said when asked about the Omaha candidate, Heath Mello. “We don’t have a list of 28 things you need to check off to be a Democrat.”


But would Schumer campaign for a candidate who didn’t support abortion rights?


“I’m not going to talk in the abstract. I’m going to see who the candidates are and talk to them. Would it trouble me? Yes. I’d try to persuade them to be pro-choice, even if they were personally pro-life.”


Intra-party fights aside, Schumer seems confident that even after years of losing at the congressional and state level, Democrats will be able to figure out a way to actually win. Shortly before the inauguration, he had told BuzzFeed News that “the onus was on us” to convince voters to come to their side. It can’t all just be about opposing Trump, he says.


“Trump is helping us, but unless we are able to put together a strong platform, policies on what we believe I think the biggest mistake is that no one knew what we stood for. Hillary doesn’t get all the blame, we all get the blame,” he says. “But you’ve got to learn if you lose an election like this to a man that’s only at 40% popularity, you have to look yourself in the eye and say, ‘What did we do wrong?’ Well, what we did wrong was not tell people what was going to make their lives better.”




“If you lose an election like this to a man that’s only at 40% popularity, you have to look yourself in the eye and say, ‘What did we do wrong?’”



Schumer says that Democrats are readying an economic plan to be released this summer. But in the meantime the senator says he is happy to continue fighting Trump from his post as minority leader.


“I was totally down in the dumps for three days [after the election], as was my wife and my two daughters, particularly my daughter who had worked in the Hillary campaign. I taught them the old Shirelles song: Mama said there’d be days like this, there’d be days like this, mama said,” Schumer recalled.


“But on the fourth day I had an epiphany, like a message from the heavens, and it went like this: ‘Look, if Hillary had been president and you had been majority leader, the job would have been a lot more fun, a lot easier, and you’d get some good things done, which is why we’re here,’” he said. “‘With Trump as president and you as minority leader, your job is much more important. You are really the only backstop to Trump.’ That has fueled me the whole way through.”



Trump’s Chief Opponent

Half of immigrants arrested in February had traffic violations or no criminal record


Of the 675 immigrants detained across the United States in a series of raids in early February, about half had no criminal record or had recorded traffic offenses, like drunk driving, the Washington Post reported.


According to the Post, congressional aides provided the records, which offered a detailed look at the backgrounds of the individuals picked up in the raids, which were purported to target “public safety threats.”



One hundred and sixty three of the immigrants detained had traffic offenses, with over 90% arrested for drunk driving. Traffic offenses made up the largest constituency of those arrested with prior convictions during the raids. Of those detained, 177 had no criminal convictions at all, though 66 of those people had charges pending, mostly for traffic offenses or immigration violations.


Two of the 675 people had been convicted of homicide, 80 were convicted of assault and 57 had convictions for “dangerous drugs.”


This data presents a reality at odds with the one Trump and his administration has portrayed about immigration and the raids again and again. A longtime arbiter of the theory that immigrants bring crime and drugs to America, Trump ran on a promise to deport immigrants. At the time of the raids in February, ICE relayed that 75% of those arrested had criminal convictions.


But this new data contradicts that statement. ICE carried out these raids during daylight hours in homes, at people’s places of employment and on the road. Some groups believe that by targeting people in public while it was light out, ICE aimed to intimidate immigrant communities.



“The Obama administration shied away from big displays of enforcement because it would alienate their base,” J. Kevin Appleby, senior director of international migration policy for the Center for Migration ­Studies of New York, told the Washington Post in February “For Trump, it is red meat for his supporters and fulfills a campaign pledge.”


Since Trump’s inauguration, several videos depicting ICE raids disrupting families and communities have gone viral. One Texas family broadcasted the broad daylight arrestof two men on Facebook Live. In March, California ICE agents arrested a father of fourwhile his daughter sobbed in the backseat of the car he was driving.



So far, according to the Post, the administration has detained 21,362 immigrants from January through mid-March.


Since the time of these raids, Trump has also instituted the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement office, which is meant to be a resource for those who have been the victim of a crime committed by an immigrant. The office’s announcement was met with boos when Trump announced it in front of Congress. When VOICE’s hotline opened in April, people began to troll it with stories of outer-space aliens rather than undocumented immigrants.



Half of immigrants arrested in February had traffic violations or no criminal record

Female genital mutilation and what we're really talking about beneath the weasel words 'genital cutting'


The recent news that a grand jury in Michigan has indicted three people, including two doctors, for female genital mutilation is a welcome development. As the first ever prosecutions of this crime in the United States, the case shines much needed light on an underground human rights abuse that has been going on for too long. Female genital mutilation has been deliberately covered up by those practicing it here or sending their daughters overseas during summer break to be mutilated outside of the law.


Yet, ham-fisted attempts to appear culturally sensitive by the likes of the New York Times reporting on this story will push these issues underground once more. The newspaper’s Health and Science Editor wrote that referring to female genital mutilation as ‘genital cutting’ is less ‘culturally loaded’ and will help to bridge a gap between those who practice FGM and those who campaign against it. In her eyes it’s a case of Africa vs. the West.


As an African who was subjected to FGM, now living in the West, allow me to help bridge that gap by explaining what we’re really talking about beneath the weasel words ‘genital cutting’.


There are five types of female genital mutilation performed on girls from as young as five years of age. Four of them are unarguably mutilation, and the other is designed to symbolize mutilation. I will start with the mildest.


1. The ‘nick’: The girl is held down, her legs pushed apart and a needle is used to prick her clitoris. The incision is similar to a finger prick test for diabetes, blood comes out and the girl is considered ‘cleansed’. Often there is a ritual with a little party to celebrate the procedure.


2. ‘Female circumcision’: The second method in terms of severity is often compared to male circumcision. The hood of the clitoris is cut off, in some cases the tip of the clitoris is cut off, known as clitoridectomy. In this form, an otherwise normally functioning body part is sliced off and thrown out. Disfiguring a little girl’s genitals in this way cannot rationally be considered anything but mutilation.


3. Intermediate infibulation: In the third form of FGM, as much of the clitoris as possible is dug out and removed. The inner labia are cut off and the outer labia are sewn together leaving two small holes for urination and menstruation. In places where this is done without ‘medical intervention’ girls have been known to bleed to death. After infibulation is done it is imperceptible what has taken place when the girl stands up with her legs together, but in the obstetrician’s position it is clearly visible that parts of her genitals have been removed and sewn up.


Sadly, we are only just past half way and female genital mutilation gets worse. No doubt setting out these practices in detail is disturbing but it is crucial that we speak openly about what is taking place rather than shroud it in euphemism so as not to cause offence.


4. Total infibulation: In the fourth type of FGM the clitoris and inner labia are cut off and the outer labia are cut or scraped off too, then sewn up. When the girl stands, even with her legs closed, her genitals clearly look different.


5. Vaginal fusing: In the fifth type of FGM, which is rarely discussed, all of the fourth type is done and then the inner walls of the vagina are scratched to cause bleeding and the sewing is again done. The girl’s feet are tied together in an effort to fuse the two sides of the vagina with scar tissue to close it up. Children can die undergoing this.


It is hard for people outside of communities practicing FGM to understand what is taking place. One example that has stayed with me over the years was a woman in the Netherlands that I translated for. I accompanied her to visit an obstetrician as she was having great difficulty with urination and menstruation. She showed the doctor her genitals after being subjected to the fifth and most severe type of FGM with her genitals completely removed. The stunned doctor asked if she had been burned. He could not believe that what had been done to her was deliberate, he assumed it must have been a horrific accident. But, it was no accident.


It’s for women like her that I started the AHA Foundation as a resource to help women and girls who are truly bridging the gap between worlds and cultures. They are living in the United States under the protection of our laws and Constitution but suffering human rights abuses imported from overseas.


The aim of FGM in all its forms is to control female sexuality. The clitoris is removed to take physical pleasure from sex and reduce the libido. In its more severe forms, involving sewing the genitals up, the aim is to ensure the girl is a virgin on her wedding night. Many women must be surgically re-opened (or simply with a pen knife or razor blade) in order to consummate their marriage.  The consequences of FGM are ongoing psychological and physical harms from infections to fistulas and even death.


Even in its most mild form, the ‘nick’ procedure involves a young girl being held down by her loved ones and a needle poked into one of her most sensitive body parts. The moment this is done the child becomes sexually aware, she can now be a temptation to men, she can destroy her family’s so-called ‘honor’ and must now behave in certain ways around boys to demonstrate her modesty.


The debate around nicking, which had been previously settled, was revived again last year by an article in the Journal of Medical Ethics. The authors argued that nicking the vulva or cutting out the hood of the clitoris (FGM forms 1 and 2 above) are less harmful and should be tolerated by liberal societies. These practices, they suggest, are ethically acceptable and not contraventions of girls’ human rights.


Indeed, like the New York Times, these academics argue that referring to modest forms of FGM ‘mutilation’ is culturally insensitive and demonizes ‘important cultural practices’. Yet the meaning of those ‘important cultural practices’ is not examined beneath their ‘ethical lens.’ Notoriously academics and politically correct apologists like them assume any claim of ‘culture’ is by rights a good thing and trumps other considerations.


Seeing as they are so reluctant to critique cultural practices, other than those of ‘powerful, white men,’ I will do it for them. The ‘nick’ symbolizes and communicates to little girls that their natural state is unclean and that pain must be inflicted on their genitals to make them acceptable to their communities.


FGM is the symptom of harmful cultural beliefs that girls and women must be sexually pure, modest and that their bodies exist to breed. Whether it’s justified by being a Muslim, Egyptian, Indian, Jewish, black, a woman or any other category venerated in the identity politics pantheon, these beliefs are not compatible with liberal societies that profess to ensure the human rights of their citizens.


I encourage anyone interested to stop this barbaric practice happening in the United States to contact us – www.ahafoundation.org.


Ayaan Hirsi Ali is founder of the AHA Foundation, which exists to protect women and girls from abuses of the sort described in this article. She is also a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford.


 



Female genital mutilation and what we're really talking about beneath the weasel words 'genital cutting'